AHNS Abstract: AHNS07

← Back to List


Program Number: AHNS07
Session Name: Scientific Session 2 - Quality of Life & Health Behaviors
Session Date: Wednesday, May 14, 2025
Session Time: 2:00 PM - 2:45 PM

Beyond aspiration: revisiting residue rates and MBS swallow profiles from the ECOG-ACRIN E3311 trial

Beatrice Manduchi, PhD1; Yael Flamand2; Robert L Ferris3; Harry Quon4; Gregory S Weinstein5; Ranee Mehra6; Joaquín J García7; Christine Peterson8; Carly E Barbon8; Jan S Lewin8; Umamaheswar Duvvuri3; Enver Ozer9; Neil B Gross8; R. Bryan Bell10; Nabil F Saba11; Wayne M Koch4; Francisco Civantos12; Tom Thomas13; Russell Smith14; Floyd Holsinger15; Saral Mehra16; Thomas Gal17; Barbara Burtness16; Katherine A Hutcheson8; 1The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston; 2Dana Farber Cancer Institute - ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center; 3UPMC Hillman Cancer Center; 4Johns Hopkins University; 5University of Pennsylvania; 6University of Maryland/Greenebaum Cancer Center; 7Mayo Clinic; 8MD Anderson Cancer Center; 9Ohio State University; 10Providence Cancer Institute; 11Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University; 12University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; 13Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center; 14Nebraska Methodist Hospital; 15Stanford Cancer Institute Palo Alto; 16Yale University; 17University of Kentucky/Markey Cancer Center

Rationale: The ECOG-ACRIN E3311 Phase II trial demonstrated a 95% 2-year progression-free survival rate in 495 patients with resectable HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) who underwent transoral surgery (TOS) followed by de-escalated risk-based post-operative management. Previously, we reported low aspiration rates, significantly better at six months in intermediate-risk patients randomized to 50Gy vs. 60Gy post-operative RT. However, swallow efficiency remains unexplored. 

Objective: Here, we report over time and across arms rates of: (i) high-grade pharyngeal residue based on modified barium swallow (MBS) studies, ii) differences in swallow safety and efficiency scores, and iii) a novel “dysphagia summary score” from site clinicians MBS assessments.

Methods: 885 MBS were performed on 314 patients from 56/59 sites at baseline, post-TOS, 6- and 24-months post-RT. Pharyngeal residue (<50% vs ≥50% residue) was recorded by site clinicians for the worst bolus performance in each MBS. DIGEST overall (D), safety (S) and efficiency (E) grades were recorded for a laboratory-graded subset of 414 studies. Site-reported residue rates were compared between arms and across time using Fisher's and McNemar tests. Wilcoxon test compared DIGEST S vs. E rates at each time point. Agreement between site-reported and laboratory-reported high-grade residue (i.e., ≥50% residue vs DIGEST E>2), and high-grade dysphagia (i.e., novel dysphagia summary=2 vs DIGEST D≥2) was assessed using Prevalence Adjusted and Biased Adjusted Kappa (PABAK).

Results: Pooling all arms, high-grade residue was reported in 2% of MBS at baseline, increasing to 15.1% after TOS (p <0.01), and decreasing to 9.3% and 6.2% at 6- and 24-months, respectively. Post-TOS residue rates did not significantly differ between arms (p=0.64). At 6-months, residue rates favored the 50Gy versus 60Gy dose arms (5.1% and 12%), although the difference was not significant (p=0.31). In the 414 lab-rated MBS, DIGEST E scores consistently showed worse outcomes than DIGEST S (p<0.01) at all time points. The novel dysphagia summary score from site-reported MBS results revealed high-grade MBS-detected dysphagia post-TOS in 21% of the entire sample that persisted at 6-months (19%) and improved modestly by 24-months (14%). Kappa agreement between site- and lab-derived results (per DIGEST criteria) was substantial for both high-grade residue (0.83, 95% CI: 0.81-0.86) and dysphagia (0.75; 95% CI: 0.72-0.78).

Conclusions: Like previously reported aspiration results, pharyngeal residue rates significantly increased after TOS but improved despite adjuvant therapy by 6 and 24 months. Residue was consistently more prevalent than aspiration, indicating that inefficiency is a primary concern for swallowing impairment in this population. The novel dysphagia summary score, easily derived from site clinicians’ MBS interpretations, exhibited strong agreement with the validated DIGEST scale, showing potential as an accessible metric in cooperative group settings. 

 

← Back to List